By Markus (27. July 2007, 19:42:52)
Re: Compiling without warnings issues
 (1 )

Can I edit my old post?

The main sentence is wrong. :-(

I want to say “With other words you should NOT use it as a base class”. The completely opposite! ;-)

Would you like to post a relpy?


This post is a reply to:
By Markus (27. July 2007, 19:40:08)
Re: Compiling without warnings issues
 (6)
Hold on! Your compiler is telling you something! ./Utils/Uri.h:148: warning: base class ‘class QSharedData’ has a non-virtual destructor In Java you have a keyword which is called final, in C# it is sealed. (more...)

Follow-ups:
By Markus (27. July 2007, 19:57:44)
Re: Compiling without warnings issues
 (0)
Hi Peter, for the other warning I was not able to find the base class BinaryReaderBase Protocols/Gnutella/Packets /Testing/../BinaryReader.h:40: warning: base class ‘class Utils::Encodings::BinaryReader’ has a non-virtual destructor But I think the compiler is right. :-) (more...)