By Petr Zemek (18. July 2007, 21:58:00)
Re: FixedSizeArray
 (1 )

Hi Peter,

ok, I’ve left only the static function with a note of it’s other possible usage. I’ve also added more operators (,>=,[]) and updated docs/tests. I can’t think of anything that may be missing, so you can check the last version and then (if you have no comments/ideas) merge it to the main branch.

Btw that Qt4 compilation and installation to my $HOME dir went ok, so it seems that I’ll be able make these tests after all. I’ll take a look at them tomorrow.

Regards,

Petr

Would you like to post a relpy?


This post is a reply to:
By Peter Dimov (18. July 2007, 20:19:10)
Re: FixedSizeArray
 (2)
Hi Petr, - I think it’s not very well known behavior (especially among less experienced C++ programmers), so one could be confused that there is only a static function and call (more...)

Follow-ups:
By Peter Dimov (19. July 2007, 14:40:44)
Re: FixedSizeArray
 (0)
Hi Petr, I agree with you that zero-filling the array in the FixedSizeArray ctor is superflous. If someone violates the precondition we guarantee that the size is valid but will not (more...)