By Peter Dimov (5. July 2007, 23:32:46)
Re: templater
 (1 )

Hi Petr,

Now that I understand the current implementation I think we should leave the templater as it is. It’s working quite nice already and I think it is not worth the effort to do a possibly complex refactoring or even a redesign just to spare some extra file reads! We better concentrate on other stuff. :-)

Once you close the templater tickes I’ll merge the templater branch to the official calitko.

Regards,

Peter

Would you like to post a relpy?


This post is a reply to:
By Petr Zemek (5. July 2007, 23:20:12)
Re: templater
 (2)
Hi Peter, Wouldn’t it be better to just design the file and dirs traversal so that the same file is not checked twice? If a module is being checked, then let’s (more...)

Follow-ups:
By Petr Zemek (5. July 2007, 23:48:39)
Re: templater
 (0)
Now that I understand the current implementation I think we should leave the templater as it is. It’s working quite nice already and I think it is not worth the (more...)