Calitko » Re: Writing exception-safe code

October 2008
M	T	W	T	F	S	S
« Nov
	1	2	3	4	5
6	7	8	9	10	11	12
13	14	15	16	17	18	19
20	21	22	23	24	25	26
27	28	29	30	31

By atul (16. April 2007, 11:35:36)

Re: Writing exception-safe code

(7 )

No mate it is not as simple as that…. I will write a detailed mail ( will read up on that a bit ) but strong exception safety is an elusive goal.

I think we should go for the basic exception safety guarantee and use more smart pointers and library calls… Also I recommend Boost again ( the deleter part of shared_ptr etc… )

— cheerio atul

Would you like to post a relpy?

This post is a reply to:

By Peter Dimov (16. April 2007, 10:41:23)

Re: Writing exception-safe code

(8)

Hi Atul, thanks for the follow-up! I think that strong exception safety is what we should be aiming at. It would be hard and would require training and lots of (more...)

Follow-ups:

By Peter Dimov (16. April 2007, 21:50:36)

Re: Writing exception-safe code

(6)

Hi Atul, I agree it is hard to achieve strong exception safety, especially in the standard template library where little assumptions can be made about the the template types. We have (more...)