http://www.calitko.org Calitko Project Home Fri, 09 Nov 2007 08:54:40 +0000 http://backend.userland.com/rss092 en Get the source code: from SourceForge.net (calitko-0.6.3-src.tar.gz) using Bazaar (bzr branch http://bzr.calitko.org/releases/calitko-0.6.3) New in this source code release: Started writing automated acceptance tests. Started work on the HTTP implementation. ... http://www.calitko.org/source-code/944 Dear all, I'm happy to announce that I submitted my master thesis on Friday, September 28. The topic is "Unit-Testing towards a Specification: A Systematic Approach" and can be downloaded from: http://bzr.calitko.org/developers/peter/MasterThesis.pdf In the thesis I do a quick introduction to Test Driven Development (TDD) and Mock Objects. Then I present CalitkoMocks - ... http://www.calitko.org/source-talk/943 Dear all, I'm planning on further developing the Http component. I will target the functionality of downloading a complete file with a single HTTP request. It will be interesting to see how the Protocol/Generics components would work for a non-packet oriented protocol. We also have dependencies of BitTorrent and Gnutella on HTTP, ... http://www.calitko.org/source-talk/942 Dear All, As a follow-up to Petr's post I'd like to express my vision of Calitko. I'll be looking forward to reading your views on our common aim and the way to achieving it. I would appreciate any feedback and ideas how to better communicate the message and aim of Caltiko ... http://www.calitko.org/source-talk/941 Hi Peter, I agree with you that we should disable the calitko.pri subproject since we're not working on it. However, I think that we should at first focus on some protocol implementation (BitTorrent seems to me as the best choice now) that will use our generic interface so we have something ... http://www.calitko.org/source-talk/940 Dear all, I'm just back from a vacation and now I'm looking forward to doing some Calitko work again! I was thinking recently that in at least in the last 6 months we have done almost no progress in the calitko.pri subproject. The application that it builds mainly runs the code in ... http://www.calitko.org/source-talk/939 Hi Peter, Yes, we should remove them, but you could filter all such warnings from the Gnutella package. Ok, I've added them to the ignore list for now. value_ is non-pointer member. Could you look more into that please? The official Intel compiler docs says about this warning: Use delete on pointer members in destructors. ... http://www.calitko.org/source-talk/938 Hi Petr, Great post! I agree with your suggestions, I'll only comment some of the warnings. using-declaration ignored — it refers to the current namespace Appears only in the Gnutella package (79 total). ./Gnutella/NodeInfo.h(36): warning #780: using-declaration ignored -- it refers to the current namespace using Gnutella::NodeType; These using declarations are superfluous, so we should ... http://www.calitko.org/source-talk/937 Dear all, I've recently added extra warnings for ICC (Intel C/C++ compiler) and compiled my latest calitko branch (developers/s3rvac/calitko,142) with this compiler (using our compilation.py script). There are some warnings which I'd like to discuss (I'll follow the following layout: "name" of the warning, places of appearance (example[s]), suggestion how to ... http://www.calitko.org/source-talk/936 Hi Peter, I think the problem is caused by the two versions of getNodes(). There is a template and non-template one. It seems that the icc compiler prefers the template version and g++ prefers the non-template one. I think a simple cast of the last argument would remedy the situation: [snip] Yes, that ... http://www.calitko.org/source-talk/935