Archive for August 2007

Re: ICC compiler warnings - discussion
Hi Peter, Yes, we should remove them, but you could filter all such warnings from the Gnutella package. Ok, I've added them to the ignore list for now. value_ is non-pointer member. Could (more...)
Re: ICC compiler warnings - discussion
Hi Petr, Great post! I agree with your suggestions, I'll only comment some of the warnings. using-declaration ignored — it refers to the current namespace Appears only in the Gnutella package (79 (more...)
ICC compiler warnings - discussion
Dear all, I've recently added extra warnings for ICC (Intel C/C++ compiler) and compiled my latest calitko branch (developers/s3rvac/calitko,142) with this compiler (using our compilation.py script). There are some warnings (more...)
Re: error: a template argument may not reference a local type
Hi Peter, I think the problem is caused by the two versions of getNodes(). There is a template and non-template one. It seems that the icc compiler prefers the template version (more...)
Re: error: a template argument may not reference a local type
Hi Petr, I think the problem is caused by the two versions of getNodes(). There is a template and non-template one. It seems that the icc compiler prefers the template version (more...)
error: a template argument may not reference a local type
Hi Peter, I've been trying to compile calitko,140 using the Intel compiler (icc/icpc), but I end on this error: Gnutella/Bootstrapping/NodeCache.h(108): error: a template argument may not reference a local type (more...)
Re: broken MinGW build
Hi Paul, Please pull the latest revision (139) of the mainstream branch and try 'make distclean && make'. The problem should be solved! Regards, Peter
Re: broken MinGW build
Hi Paul, I did reproduce that with MinGW and Qt4.2.2. The problem is in qmake - it fails to add the dependencies that are generated by qmake extra compilers. I had (more...)
broken MinGW build
The problem appears to be much more general than I described, so I have ticketed it (#55). I might look into this more later, especially if someone could send me (more...)
Re: compilation.py feedback
Hi Peter, Would you like to do any additional work on the script or should I merge to mainstream already? I'll check the current implementation once more tomorrow (I won't manage to (more...)

Next Page »