Hi Peter, for the other warning I was not able to find the base class BinaryReaderBase Protocols/Gnutella/Packets /Testing/../BinaryReader.h:40: warning: base class ‘class Utils::Encodings::BinaryReader’ has a non-virtual destructor But I think the compiler is right. :-) (more...)

Can I edit my old post? The main sentence is wrong. :-( I want to say "With other words you should NOT use it as a base class". The completely opposite! ;-)

Hold on! Your compiler is telling you something! ./Utils/Uri.h:148: warning: base class ‘class QSharedData’ has a non-virtual destructor In Java you have a keyword which is called final, in C# it is sealed. (more...)

Hi Petr, Maybe we should create a list with warnings that are being “ignored” (resolved as non-problematic and hard/superfluous to fix)? That's a good idea! We could keep a list of warnings (more...)

Hi Petr, have a great time and a fun ride! :-) See you in a week! Peter

Hi Petr, have a great time and a fun ride! :-) See you in a week! Peter

Dear all, I'm going on a holiday/trip with my family to Sumava mountains (CZE), so I won't be here for a week. We are leaving tommorow (2007-07-28) and arriving on (more...)

Hi Peter, I’m mostly having trouble with this: Protocols/Gnutella/Packets/Testing/../BinaryReader.h:40: warning: base class ‘class Utils::Encodings::BinaryReader’ has a non-virtual destructor ./Utils/Uri.h:148: warning: base class ‘class QSharedData’ has a non-virtual destructor [snip] I’ve read some mailing list discussions (more...)

Dear all, I was very enthusiastic about fixing all warnings, but now I'm concerned whether that's a good idea. The whole notion of compiling at high warning levels is great, some (more...)