Archive for 2. July 2007

Re: TrackerRequestDriver feedback
Hi Petr, - We can’t guarantee that to the FixedByteArray constructor one wouldn’t pass array with different number of bytes (or to some member function, if any), so we should think (more...)
Re: TrackerRequestDriver feedback
Hi Peter, Just checked your rev 140: [cut] and I thought that we actually need and would need this thing quite often. For example Protocols::Generics::VendorCode is just that - 4 byte QByteArray. We (more...)
Re: TrackerRequestDriver feedback
Hi Petr, Just checked your rev 140: \todo Add assertions/validations for hash info and peer ID (these have to be correctly set and (more...)
On Waterfall model
Dear all, I thought that would be a fun read for you too! :-) http://tarmo.fi/blog/2005/09/09/dont-draw-diagrams-of-wrong-practices-or-why-people-still-believe-in-the-waterfall-model/ Regards, Peter
Re: TrackerRequestDriver feedback
Hi Petr, Maybe the built binary should be copied to AppData by make? I was thinking that only application data (icons, images, …) would be there at first (more...)
Re: TrackerRequestDriver feedback
Hi Peter, I think I’d call Sources Calitko. Maybe CalitkoMocks better be in . or in ./Utils - the idea is that it eventually becomes a standalone library.Maybe the built binary (more...)
Re: Class Uri: review
Hi Petr, Thanks for the review! Comments are inline: As for these UTF-8 conversions - I’d personally first make our Uri class using only ASCII characters (because this is what we currently (more...)
Re: TrackerRequestDriver feedback
Hi Petr, I’m thinking about something like this, you can check it out, too: - 3rdParty (cppunit, moc, qmake) - Sources (Protocols, UIs, Utils, CalitkoMocks, …) - Utils (templater and other possible stuff that (more...)
Class Uri: review
Hi Peter, I've checked the Uri class and below are my ideas/comments to the current code. I must say that the idea with the Uri class was really briliant! I'm sure (more...)