Thanks for the reply, Bo! The first thing we need to do is decide on a marking system! Ideas? About who is deciding, I’d say everybody is allowed to propose a marking, (more...)

Hi Bo, you are right about next weekend being Christmas time. I totally forgot about that :-)! Anyway, I think it would be much more easily to agree on a (more...)

Dear all, I have a number of interesting things on the queue, which need some polishing before publishing but here is one that might deserve your attention. I hope I can (more...)

Hi Atul. It is really sorry to hear, you are not able to take part in the first discussion. But if this trial is successful, we will have regular discussions. @Peter: The (more...)

Hi Peter, Good idea! It would be helpful for new comers to know, what can be improved, where the work is. But my question is, who is responsible to give the mark (more...)

Hello everybody, I was thinking about how we could have a good measure of how much we are advancing with Calitko. There are undoubtedly at least two measures: quality and quantity. (more...)

Hi Atul, It’s good we reached 100 tests already! I guess that we’ll soon be at 1000 ;-) and we will have learnt a lot more about unit testing and will (more...)

Hi Atul, It's really a pity you won't be able to participate on Saturday! I'd say that we make the conference call anyway and plan yet another one next weekend. I (more...)

Hi Atul, the test is really much more readable! I pushed the patch in revno 91 of your public branch. Only had to change the #includes because of the new (more...)

Oops I think I need to use Http:RequestHeader etc. and base my tests on those... Just came across this class while browsing the code... Will update... --- cheers atul atul wrote: Hi all Here are some (more...)