Archive for 14. December 2006

Re: Re: Proposal: Mark each the progress level of each class.
Thanks for the reply, Bo! The first thing we need to do is decide on a marking system! Ideas? About who is deciding, I’d say everybody is allowed to propose a marking, (more...)
Re: Re: Invitation to the teleconferencing
Hi Bo, you are right about next weekend being Christmas time. I totally forgot about that :-)! Anyway, I think it would be much more easily to agree on a (more...)
Feedback request: class Connection documentation
Dear all, I have a number of interesting things on the queue, which need some polishing before publishing but here is one that might deserve your attention. I hope I can (more...)
Re: Invitation to the teleconferencing
Hi Atul. It is really sorry to hear, you are not able to take part in the first discussion. But if this trial is successful, we will have regular discussions. @Peter: The (more...)
Re: Proposal: Mark each the progress level of each class.
Hi Peter, Good idea! It would be helpful for new comers to know, what can be improved, where the work is. But my question is, who is responsible to give the mark (more...)
Proposal: Mark each the progress level of each class.
Hello everybody, I was thinking about how we could have a good measure of how much we are advancing with Calitko. There are undoubtedly at least two measures: quality and quantity. (more...)
Re: We reach 100 tests ;-)
Hi Atul, It’s good we reached 100 tests already! I guess that we’ll soon be at 1000 ;-) and we will have learnt a lot more about unit testing and will (more...)
Re: Re: Invitation to the teleconferencing
Hi Atul, It's really a pity you won't be able to participate on Saturday! I'd say that we make the conference call anyway and plan yet another one next weekend. I (more...)
Re: Refactored testReadTorrent ( patch for calitko 0.5.7 )
Hi Atul, the test is really much more readable! I pushed the patch in revno 91 of your public branch. Only had to change the #includes because of the new (more...)
Re: We reach 100 tests ;-)
Oops I think I need to use Http:RequestHeader etc. and base my tests on those... Just came across this class while browsing the code... Will update... --- cheers atul atul wrote: Hi all Here are some (more...)

Next Page »