Hi all, just let you know that there's a new revision in the Kad branch (http://bzr.calitko.org/developers/david/calitko-Kad). I've added some new packets and corrected some errors. Next steps will involve writing more (more...)

hi, I think what Atul means is that there is no need to make extensive encapsulation: a wrapper is good if you want to change the output of a method to (more...)

I'm a bit confused, Atul! Are you talking about BDecoder or BinaryReader? Could you elaborate your point a bit please? Regards, Peter Peter Dimov wrote:Hi Atul, the thing is that with integers (more...)

Hi Atul, the thing is that with integers we might need to swap bytes whereas readBytes() and readCString() should never swap bytes. Or maybe I got you wrong? Peter atul wrote:Dear all Why (more...)

Dear all Why not use int QByteArray::toInt() and leave all the processing to it? ;-) I mean we could write a BinaryReader::toInt() wrapper and that could just call the QByteArray version.... So there would (more...)

Ahh, I should have saved the file after deleting the inline from the functions! The correct revision is 80. Peter Dimov wrote:Hi Atul, Thanks for the comments! I see your point about (more...)

Hi Atul, Thanks for the comments! I see your point about inlining... it’s kind of premature optimization. I removed the inlines and committed the patch in revno 79 ;-). Regards, Peter atul wrote:Dear Peter, I (more...)

Dear Peter, I totally agree with you about the assert.... About copyBytes, I would leave it in... as it is more readable and one very good rule to follow is being cohesive... (more...)