Hi Sebastien, I’m also relatively new to unit testing but anyway, here is how I get it (I hope someone more experienced with unit testing would comment as well). Regarding sockets and (more...)

Hi Sebastien, I think all agree that comments are very important and that’s the reason why all new code is required to have documentation. I would suggest that all code that (more...)

Hi Sebastien, Thanks for the comments! Brainstorming should be going on all the time ;-). Thanks to your comment about the TCP/IP model vs. the ISO/OSI model, I think I finally (more...)

Hello, Yes i afree that Unit test is useful. And test driven development(write first test and then code) helps a lot in some cases.  But i am wondering if unit test (more...)

Hi Yes comments is more than needed it is mandatory. There is otherwise no way for a new developer to join a project, or it would requires a lot of time (more...)

Hello, Here is my thought on this problem(if the brainstorming is still going on  :) ) What do you think about the ISO/OSI layers to classes mapping? How can this mapping be improved? To (more...)

Hi all, Attached is an early version of PacketSessionTest.cpp. It won’t compile yet but hopefully you can have a look at it and give some ideas. I think I slowly start (more...)

Hi Atul, The tests are nice! I find testInvalidatePayload() particularly interesting! Another interesting test would be to copy a packet that was invalidated, and then call rawPayload() on the copy. Both (more...)

Hi all I added many tests.... Some of the interesting ones are the self assignment tests. These are supposed not to change the packet semantically ... ( *m_p = *m_p ) (more...)